A New Era for Western Springs Stadium?

Western Springs Stadium 2025

Update: July 2025

Auckland Football Club’s rich-lister owners have pulled their proposal to take over Western Springs Stadium.

The privately funded venue focused on football, Auckland Arena, was backed by entrepreneur Anna Mowbray, her husband, former All Black Ali Williams, American businessman Bill Foley, and New Zealander and NBA player Steven Adams.

May 2025

Locals will have plenty memories of our local Western Springs Stadium. Watching Ponsonby Rugby on their home groud, Ripper Rugby with the kids. For years Western Springs has been the local home of speedway. The roar of cars on a summer night.

What about the sound of those legendary concerts and festivals? Bowie, Bono and Bob. Meatloaf, Led Zep, , Six 60, Boz Scaggs, AC/DC, Elton. Rod Stewart, Big Day Out. Laneway and CharliXCX.

Currently the grounds are the base for the Boring Machine yes, it really is called this) forWatercare’s Central Interceptor project.

With the Speedway gone, Western Springs Stadium is now facing a potential transformation.

The choices are between a modern, football-centric arena, a dedicated music and community sports hub, or maintaining the current setup. All choices will have long-lasting implications for the sporting, cultural, and community landscape of Auckland.

Auckland Council, in collaboration with Tātaki Auckland Unlimited (TAU), has opened public consultation on three different options that could redefine the future of this significant site. This consultation, running from May 19th to June 15th, 2025, invites us to share our views on which option we prefer.

The public consultation period provides a vital opportunity for people to voice their preferences and help shape the next chapter for Western Springs Stadium. Following the consultation, Auckland Council is scheduled to meet on July 31st to review the feedback and analysis before making a decision on the future of this significant Auckland facility.

Option 1: The Auckland Arena

A state-of-the-art, privately funded multi-purpose venue known as the Auckland Arena. Funded by locals Anna Mowbray and former All Black Ali Williams, co-owners of the city’s new football club, Auckland FC.

The couple are well known locally re the court case and public campaing for granting permission to build a helicopter pad at their Westmere home.

This option centers around a new 12,500 to 15,000-seat stadium. This stadium would not only serve as the home ground for Auckland FC but also function as a concert venue.

As well as a stadium the Auckland Arena proposal includes:

high-performance training facilities and fields,
indoor basketball courts
football fields
padel courts

Initial assessment by TAU suggests that private sector investment of $200-$300 million in the new stadium, along with full responsibility for operating and maintenance costs, could reduce the need for public funding by $18.1 million over 50 years.

A key aspect of this proposal is that the initial construction and ongoing maintenance would be covered by the proposers, with ownership of the built infrastructure transferring to TAU at the end of a long-term lease (50 years with two 25-year renewal rights). Initial assessments suggest this could significantly reduce the need for public funding compared to other two scenarios.

Option 2: The Western Springs Bowl

This option focuses on enhancing the site’s natural amphitheater to create a premier Hollywood Bowl style live music concert and festival venue with a 50,000-person capacity. This proposal includes new permanent staging infrastructure and upgrades to concert facilities on the outer fields. IHave you been to the Brooklands Bowl in New Plymouth? Something like this.

The Hollywood Bowl

This option also proposes the development of a 5,000 to 8,000-seat stadium, allowing the facility to cater to a broader range of community and semi-professional sports. Ponsonby Rugby Club, a long-term tenant, would renew its current lease.”

This proposal requires a mix of upfront private sector investment and Auckland Council capital investment, with TAU retaining ownership of the site under an initial 30-year lease with two 10-year renewal rights. Initial estimates suggest this option could result in an additional cost to ratepayers over 50 years due to ongoing operation and maintenance.

Option 3: Maintaining the Status Quo or Exploring Other Ideas

The third option considers retaining the existing arrangements, which includes potentially extending the lease with Ponsonby Rugby Club (currently expiring in 2027) and TAU continuing to manage the venue for concerts and festivals. This option also leaves the door open to exploring alternative ideas for the venue, including the possibility of speedway returning to Western Springs in some form. The estimated cost to ratepayers for maintaining the existing arrangements with a lease extension to Ponsonby Rugby Club is projected to be lower than the Western Springs Bowl option over a 50-year period.

Wider Issues- these are not currently being considered by Auckland Council

How many stadiums does Auckland need? And what happens to the current ones? Greater Auckland have started this discussion.

What about bringing back the Speedway?

The new Waiaraka Park project is well underway. This is not being considered in the Have your Say.

Resource consent was awarded in March 2025 to allow the major construction works to start.

Phase 1 –the New Pit area – is underway, earthworks began in early March to extend the pit area outside the racetrack.

Phase 2 – theupgraded track area – began on time on 10 April.

Full information on Waiaraka Park project -Tātaki Auckland Unlimited Update here

It looks like the “ship has sailed”. Building is underway, NZ Speedway want better more up to date facilities. Current health and safety laws would have to be changed to bring Speedway back to this location.

Pros

Economic benefits: Local revenue through events, tourism, and visitors to our area

Community benefits: Providing a local place for entertainment and sports within easy walking/cycling distance.

Cultural significance: Continuing Western Springs as a venue with historical or cultural importance to Auckland. Improving existing infrastructure

Job creation: Local employment in event management, hospitality, security, sports.

Visits from friends and family – there’s nothing like living near Springs when there is a big show on and a bed is needed!

Cons:

Traffic congestion: This is already problematic. What would it be like during a large event?

It Might Get Loud – mmm – most of us are used to it. Best not to live here if you can’t handle some occasional noise. But what say there were lots more events?

Lights – how bright will it be for a night game? Will locals be affected by a constant bright night sky.

Parking limitations: Aucklanders like to drive. Where will they all park? It’s difficult enough now. Will other options be set up for buses, vans, bikes, to get to and from the venue?

Environmental concerns: Issues related to waste management, emissions, and potential ecological impact. We already know about the rubbish in the nearby Bullock Track reserve.

Maintenance and operational costs: Significant expenses for rate payers with running a more complex venue.

Underutilisation: Risk of the stadium not being used frequently enough

Potential for disruption during redevelopment

Conflicting interests of different community groups, event organiser, and residents.

Potential Pros of Private Ownership/Long-Term Lease:

Reduced Burden on Ratepayers: As seen in Option 1 (“Auckland Arena”), private investment could cover the initial construction costs (estimated at $200-$300 million) and ongoing maintenance. This could significantly reduce the financial burden on Auckland Council and its ratepayers compared to publicly funded or mixed-funding models.

Private Sector Expertise and Efficiency: Private owners or operators may bring specialised expertise in stadium management, event promotion, and commercial development, potentially leading to more efficient and profitable operations.

Faster Development: With private capital readily available, a projectc could proceed more quickly than if reliant on Auckland Council funding cycles and approvals.

Potential for Enhanced Facilities: Private investment could lead to the development of modern, high-quality facilities that might not be achievable with limited public funds. Option 1 envisions a 12,500-15,000 seat stadium with high-performance facilities, indoor basketball courts, and more.

Increased Economic Activity: Successful private operation could attract more events and visitors, boosting the local economy through tourism, hospitality, and related industries.

Potential Cons of Private Ownership/Long-Term Lease:

Community views overridden : A private owner’s primary goal is profit, which could lead to decisions over community access, affordability, or the broader public good.

Potential for Limited Public Access: Private owners could restrict public access or charge higher fees for community use to maximise profits. Sir Bryan Williams raised concerns about a “private, locked facility” in response to the fully private proposal.

Loss of Public Control and Influence: Selling or leasing the stadium long-term to a private entity would reduce the public’s direct control over a significant community asset and limit Auckland Council’s ability to influence its future direction.

Potential for Asset Stripping or Neglect: While less likely with reputable operators, there’s a risk in the long term that a private owner prioritises sprofits over long-term investment and maintenance, potentially leading to the decline of the facility over time.

Impact on Local Character and Heritage: Depending on the redevelopment plans, private ownership will lead to changes which alter the character and change the history of the Western Springs site.

Watercare Access? Is this still needed?

Flood Risk? What happens if with significant rain events to this area? Is it on a flood plain?

Concerns

Option 1 (Auckland Arena – Private Funding): This option offers the advantage of being privately funded, potentially saving ratepayers a substantial amount. Concerns about public access and the long-term implications of a 50-100 year lease need careful consideration. Option 1 proposes a very long-term lease (up to 100 years), which would tie Auckland Council’s hands for an extended period, limiting future decisions.

Option 2 (Western Springs Bowl – Mixed Funding): A mix of private and ratepayer funding, suggests a shared responsibility. The potential pros and cons would lie somewhere between full public and full private ownership, requiring a careful balance to ensure both community benefits and financial sustainability.

Option 3 (Status Quo or Other Ideas – Public Ownership): Retaining full public ownership would allow Auckland Council to maintain control and prioritise community needs. However, it would require public funding for maintenance and upgrades.

It’s Complicated!

Private ownership of Western Springs Stadium could offer financial benefits and potentially lead to larger facilities. However, it also carries risks related to public access, affordability, and loss of public control. The speed of the improvements is appealing, compared to the often glacial speed of Auckland Council.

A thorough community and Council evaluation of any specific proposal is crucial, considering the long-term implications for Auckland and ensuring that any private arrangement includes robust safeguards for public benefit. The current “Have your Say” process is an important firs step in gathering initial public feedback to steer this important decision.

A Crossroads for Springs

Western Springs holds a special place in the hearts of Aucklanders. Its original history as a water source, Ponosnby Rugby Club with its deep traditions and contribution to the game, the countless concerts have woven Western Springs into the fabric of the inner West identity.

Have Your Say – What do you think?

Deadline June 15th

A New Era for Western Springs Stadium?

Recent Articles

Fiona Tarlton: Marine Conservator, Trustee, Kelly Tarlton’s Marine Wildlife Trust